Skip to main content Skip to footer

Autonomous Vehicles

An Autonomous Vehicle (AV) is designed to be capable of sensing its environment and operating without human involvement. 

A human passenger is not required to take control of the vehicle at any time, nor present in the vehicle at all. AVs are designed to go anywhere a traditional car goes and do everything that an experienced human driver does.

AVs, rider-only cars or self-driving vehicles use sensors, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and computing to drive themselves without human intervention, performing tasks like steering and braking. 

They rely on a combination of hardware and software to perceive their surroundings and navigate journeys.

An AV drives through a neighbourhood with graphics of signals transmitting from the vehicle

Source: Waymo USA

What is the current situation in the UK?

The Autonomous Vehicle Act

The UK's Automated Vehicles Act 2024 establishes a legal framework for self-driving vehicles, defining safety standards, clarifying liability by placing responsibility on corporations like manufacturers rather than individual drivers, and creating an in-use assurance system.

The Act allows for a gradual rollout, focusing initially on driverless services like automated taxis and goods transport rather than widespread private vehicle adoption. It aims to enable the safe deployment of autonomous technology, building on recommendations from the Law Commissions and setting safety principles that self-driving vehicles must meet to be authorised for use on UK roads.  The act also allows for the protection of terms like "self-driving" to prevent misleading marketing of driver-assistance systems. 

  • The act requires self-driving vehicles to achieve a level of safety at least as high as careful and competent human drivers, as well as meeting rigorous safety checks before being allowed onto roads. 
  • The act delivers the most comprehensive legal framework of its kind worldwide, setting out who is liable for AVs meaning that drivers can be assured that, while their vehicle is in self-driving mode, they will not be held responsible for how the vehicle drives. For the first time, corporations such as insurance providers, software developers and automotive manufacturers can assume this responsibility.  

Safety principles standard

The Department for Transport (DfT) and Centre for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles’ (CCAV) launched a consultation in June 2025 on the AV safety principles statement (consultation closed on 1 Sept). The call for evidence seeks views on what safety standards should be sought for AVs in the UK.  Section 2 of the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 requires the Secretary of State for Transport to prepare a Statement of Safety Principles that apply to AVs.   

This statement will be used in different ways across the safety framework, including:  

  • When authorisation authorities carry out vehicle type approval and authorisation checks (pre-deployment) 
  • When regulators carry out in-use monitoring and regulatory compliance checks (post-deployment) 
  • For annual assessments on the overall performance of automated vehicles  

Living Streets fed in to the RoSPA consultation response which can be seen here.

WHAT WE THINK

BENEFITS 

Road Safety 

The path to Vision Zero requires reducing severe crashes and improving the safety of those most at risk. The Institute for Engineering and Technology (IET) claims that for every 10,000 errors made by drivers, a self-driving vehicle will commit just one. This is supported by evidence showing that in 2020, 88% of all recorded collisions on roads in Great Britain involved human error as a contributory factor. 

Research from studies in the US suggest that AV can reduce the number of severe collisions and impacts to the most vulnerable road user.  

Impacts on car ownership 

The wider impact of AV operators on our streets and behaviour in the UK is not known. However, in the long term if usage is well planned, the market for individual car ownership may reduce. This could lead to freeing up kerbside space, as well as reduced congestion and air pollution, but this is yet to be proven. 

 

CONCERNS

Accountability and safety

The development of AVs raises critical ethical, moral and practical questions around how AVs are programmed to behave when exposed to pedestrians on the street, and who or what is responsible for road behaviour when crashes take place. The Autonomous Vehicle Act 2024 goes someway to setting out the liability framework for AV technology, which we welcome. 

It is critical that AV operators can demonstrate that their cars can mix safely with all road users in each location before being allowed onto streets used by people walking and wheeling. Human error is predictable (this is the premise of Vision Zero). It can only be reduced when/where humans are removed from the equation. Interaction of AVs with vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists etc that are not AV will continue to be unpredictable. For this reason, AVs should only be permitted when a high degree of safety can be guaranteed, without relying on human intervention at critical moments. AVs could be limited to specific infrastructures (e.g. guided busways) and speeds until safe operation can be guaranteed. 

Pedestrian priority 

We are living with streets that have been designed around the car – for the last 80 years priority has been given to the motor vehicle and traffic flow. This needs to change.

Technology should not be introduced at the expense of pedestrian or cyclist freedom to use roads and pavements safely and conveniently. If AVs are to be successfully introduced, they must adhere to the Hierachy of Road Users, the Highway Code (including pedestrian priority at side roads) and should be part of the solution to re-design our streets to put the most vulnerable at the heart of change.  

A parent and child walk across a road with a 20mph speed limit indicated